Journal of Contemporary Islamic LawNo eISSN: 0127-788X
Are the Limitations on Remedies Fair? A Comparative Study Between the US Law and Islamic Law
Fahad Mubarak Aldossary, email@example.com
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law, USA.
Received: 02 May 2021 | Accepted: 11 November 2021 | Published: 15 December 2021
2021, Vol. 6(2), pp. 43-54. | PDF
This paper addresses similarities and differences between the US law and Islamic law, and considers how each system might benefit from the other. Within the scope of limitations on remedies, the paper explores foreseeability, causation, mitigation, and certainty. How the two systems understand the concepts is described, and the concepts are examined through the lens of fairness. A comparative analysis follows, investigating similarities, divergences, and possible enhancements to the law. The foundation of morality, set in the context of the two systems, establishes grounds for the potential merger of morality and the limitations on remedies. The perspective of justice is a central and crucial point of divergence between the two systems, and the conundrum of flexibility versus faithfulness to the principles of law informs the major findings of the study. Although, there is a noticeable tendency of the two systems to hold a similar legal stance despite their different legal structures.
Keywords: contracts law, comparative law, Islamic law, remedies, damages
Alashqar, Omar. (1982). History of Islamic Law. Jordan: Alfalah Book House.
Alhaidary, Mansour. (2012). Measuring Compensation from Credit Reporting Damage: A Comparison of Islamic, Saudi, and American Law in Light of Credit Information Reporting Acts. PhD diss., University of Kansas.
Alkhafif, Ali. (2000). Liability in Islamic Law. Egypt: Alfikr Alrabi Book House.
Almarzoqi, Muhammad. (2009). Liability of Person’s Negligence. Lebanon: Arab Network for Research and Publishing.
Alzuhayli, Wahbah. (2012). Liability Theory. Jordan: Alfikr Book House.
Anderson, Roy R. (2014-2015). Damages Under the Uniform Commercial Code. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.
Asad, Muhammad. (2003). The Message of The Quran. England: The Book Foundation.
Barawi, Muhammad. (2018). Philosophy of Ethics in Islamic Law. Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Benson, Peter. (2019). Justice in Transactions a Theory of Contract Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Bix, Brian. (2012). Contract Law: Rules, Theory, and Context. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Blum, Brian A. (2013). Contracts. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Brown, Charles G. (1975). The Doctrine of Impossibility of Performance and the Foreseeability Test. Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 6, no. 3.
Cullison, Alan D. (1985). Morality and the Foundations of Legal Positivism. Valparaiso University Law Review 20, no. 1.
Danzig, Richard, And Watson, Geoffrey R. (2004). The Capability Problem in Contract Law: Further Readings on Well-Known Cases. New York: Foundation Press.
DiMatteo, Larry A. (1997). Counterpoise of Contracts: The Reasonable Person Standard and the Subjectivity of Judgment. South Carolina Law Review 48, no. 2.
Farnsworth, E. Allan. (1999). Contracts. New York: Aspen Law & Business.
Gilmore, Grant. (1974). The Death of Contract. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
Ibn Hanbal, Ahmed. (2001). Almusnad. Lebanon: Alrisalah Book House.
Jones, Harry W. (1961). Law and Morality in the Perspective of Legal Realism. Columbia Law Review 61, no. 5.
Lambright, Daniel. (2015). Man, Morality, and the United States Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 5.
Letsas, George and Saprai, Prince. (2014). Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Makdisi, George. (1997). Ibn’aqil: Religion and Cultural in Classical Islam. U.K: Edinburgh University Press.
McCormick, Charles T and Fritz, William F. (1952). Cases and Materials on Damages. Brooklyn: Foundation Press.
McDowell, Banks. (1988). Causation in Contracts and Insurance. Connecticut Law Review 20, no. 3.
Ministry of Islamic Affairs. (1992). Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence. Kuwait: That Alsalasil Book House.
Moufi, Ahmed. (1997). Harm in Islamic Law. Saudi Arabia: Ibn Affan Book House.
O’Gorman, Daniel. (2017). Contracts, Causation, and Clarity. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 78, no. 3.
Posner, Eric A. (2011). Contract Law and Theory. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Seana, Valentine Shiffrin. (2007). The Divergence of Contract and Promise. Harvard Law Review 120, no. 3.
MacCormick, Neil. (1999). Reasonableness and Objectivity. Notre Dame Law Review 74, no. 5.
Siraj, Muḥammad. (1990). Torts Liability in Islamic Law. Jordan: Althaqafah Book House.
Treitel, G. H. (1988). Remedies for Breach of Contract a Comparative Account. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bd. of Educ. v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, 71 N.Y.2d 21, 523 N.Y.S.2d 475, 517 N.E.2d 1360 (1987).
Energy Capital Corp. v. United States, 47 Fed. Cl. 382 (2000).
Griffin v. Colver, 16 N.Y. 489 (1858).
Hadley v. Baxendale,  EWHC Exch J70 (1854) 9 Ex Ch 341; 156 ER 145.
North v. Johnson, 58 Minn. 242, 59 N.W. 1012 (1894).
S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Warner Co., 576 F.2d 524 (3d Cir. 1978).