Sains Malaysiana 50(11)(2021): 3421-3438

http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5011-25

 

 

Efficiency of Higher Education in the Presence of Shared Inputs using Data Envelopment Analysis

(Kecekapan Pendidikan Tinggi dengan Perkongsian Input menggunakan Analisis Penyampulan Data)

 

MICHAEL GIDEY GEBRU1,2*, SAQLAIN RAZA1 & MANSOOR SHAUKAT KHAN1

 

1Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan

 

2Department of Mathematics, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia

 

Diserahkan: 26 November 2020/Diterima: 13 Mac 2021

 

ABSTRACT

This study measures the efficiency of higher education institutions with respect to teaching activity, research activity, and overall activities and also provides a direction for low-performing institutions to improve their performance. In many instances, the efficiency of the institution is a sum up of the efficiency of its activities. However, when the activities consume some resources in common, it requires the allocation of shared resources among the activities. Since sums up the efficiency of each activity does not give the institution's overall efficiency, we use a joint data envelopment analysis that takes into account the institution's internal operations to measure the teaching efficiency, research efficiency, and overall efficiency of the institutions. The empirical results indicate that the institutions that execute both activities simultaneously become more productive rather than adopt a single activity. Hence, this study suggests a useful and measurable action to improve the institution’s performance.

 

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; efficiency; higher educations; shared inputs

 

ABSTRAK

Kajian ini mengukur kecekapan institusi pengajian tinggi dengan melihat kepada aktiviti pengajaran, aktiviti penyelidikan dan keseluruhan aktiviti serta memberikan panduan kepada institusi berprestasi rendah untuk meningkatkan prestasi mereka. Dalam banyak keadaan, kecekapan institusi diukur dengan jumlah kecekapan aktivitinya. Walau bagaimanapun, apabila aktiviti ini menggunakan beberapa sumber yang sama, ia memerlukan peruntukan pengagihan sumber antara aktiviti tersebut. Oleh kerana jumlah kecekapan setiap aktiviti tidak memberikan kecekapan keseluruhan institusi, kami menggunakan analisis penyampulan data yang mempertimbangkan operasi dalaman institusi untuk mengukur kecekapan pengajaran, kecekapan penyelidikan serta kecekapan keseluruhan institusi. Hasil empirik menunjukkan bahawa institusi yang menjalankan kedua-dua aktiviti tersebut secara serentak menjadi lebih produktif daripada yang menjalankan satu aktiviti. Maka, kajian ini mencadangkan tindakan yang berguna dan dapat diukur untuk meningkatkan prestasi institusi.

 

Kata kunci: Analisis penyampulan data; input dikongsi; kecekapan; pengajian tinggi

 

RUJUKAN

Abbott, M. & Doucouliagos, C. 2003. The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review 22(1): 89-97.

Afonso, A. & Aubyn, M.S. 2006. Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs. Economic Modelling 23(3): 476-491.

Agasisti, T. 2014. The efficiency of public spending on education: An empirical comparison of EU countries. European Journal of Education 49(4): 543-557.

Aviles-Sacoto S. 2012. A restricted multiplier DEA model for identifying best practices for attracting students into a Mexican university - case study: School of Business at ITESM, Master's thesis, (ITESM) (Technological and Higher Education Institute of Monterrey, Mexico) (Unpublished).

Avkiran, N.K. 2011. Applications of data envelopment analysis in the service sector. In Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Boston: Springer. pp. 403-443.

Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9): 1078-1092.

Beasley, J.E. 1995. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46(4): 441-452.

Boulton, G. & Lucas, C. 2011. What are universities for? Chinese Science Bulletin 56(23): 2506-2517.

Bradley, S., Johnes, G. & Millington, J. 2001. The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European Journal of Operational Research 135(3): 545-568.

Castano, M.C.N. & Cabanda, E.C. 2007. Performance evaluation of the efficiency of Philippine Private Higher Educational Institutions: Application of frontier approaches. International Transactions in Operational Research 14(5): 431-444.

Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. 1962. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 9(4): 181-186.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.

Chen, J.K. & Chen, I.S. 2011. Inno-Qual efficiency of higher education: Empirical testing using data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 38(3): 1823-1834.

Cook, W.D., Tone, K. & Zhu, J. 2014. Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega 44: 1-4.

Dufrechou, P.A. 2016. The efficiency of public education spending in Latin America: A comparison to high-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development 49: 188-203.

Elbanna, S. & Abdel-Maksoud, A. 2020. Organizational resources and performance: The case of an oil-rich country. Public Performance & Management Review 43(3): 713-739.

Farrell, M.J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General) 120(3): 253-281.

Fromhold-Eisebith, M. & Werker, C. 2013. Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A geographical perspective. The Annals of Regional Science 51(3): 621-643.

Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M. & Tiongson, E.R. 2002. The effectiveness of government spending on education and health care in developing and transition economies. European Journal of Political Economy 18(4): 717-737.

Hall, P. 1986. On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. The Annals of Statistics 14(4): 1453-1462.

Hanushek, E.A. & Woessmann, L. 2008. The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature 46(3): 607-668.

Hanushek, E.A. & Luque, J.A. 2003. Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review 22(5): 481-502.

Herbst, M. 2007. Financing public universities. Higher Education Dynamics 18(1): 90-94.

Johnes, J. 2006. Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research 174(1): 443-456.

Johnes, J. & Li, Y.U. 2008. Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Economic Review 19(4): 679-696.

Joumady, O. & Ris, C. 2005. Performance in European higher education: A non‐parametric production frontier approach. Education Economics 13(2): 189-205.

Kirjavainen, T. & Loikkanent, H.A. 1998. Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review 17(4): 377-394.

Kong, W.H. & Fu, T.T. 2012. Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega 40(5): 541-549.

Lall, V. & Teyarachakul, S. 2006. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system selection: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems 47(1): 123-127.

Lang, D.W. & Zha, Q. 2004. Comparing universities: A case study between Canada and China. Higher Education Policy 17(4): 339-354.

Lee, B.L. & Worthington, A.C. 2016. A network DEA quantity and quality-orientated production model: An application to Australian university research services. Omega 60: 26-33.

Leithwood, K. & Menzies, T. 1998. Forms and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational Policy 12(3): 325-346.

Liefner, I. 2003. Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education 46(4): 469-489.

Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y., Lu, W.M. & Lin, B.J. 2013. A survey of DEA applications. Omega 41(5): 893-902.

Mancebon, M.J. & Molinero, C.M. 2000. Performance in primary schools. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51(7): 843-854.

Molinero, C.M. 1996. On the joint determination of efficiencies in a data envelopment analysis context. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47(10): 1273-1279.

Moncayo-Martínez, L.A., Ramírez-Nafarrate, A. & Hernández-Balderrama, M.G. 2020. Evaluation of public HEI on teaching, research, and knowledge dissemination by data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 69: 100-115.

Nazarko, J. & Saparauskas, J. 2014. Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(1): 25-44.

Ramzi, S. & Ayadi, M. 2016. Assessment of universities efficiency using data envelopment analysis: Weights restrictions and super-efficiency measure. Journal of Applied Management and Investments 5(1): 40-58.

Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C. & Agasisti, T. 2017. Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling. Omega 67: 123-133.

Shimshak, D.G. & Wagner, J.M. 2012. Efficiency in public higher education systems: A statewide comparison using data envelopment analysis, In Applications of Management Science. Vol. 15, edited by Lawrence, K.D. & Kleinman, G. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. pp. 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1108.

Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics 136(1): 31-64.

Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science 44(1): 49-61.

Taylor, B. & Harris, G. 2004. Relative efficiency among South African universities: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education 47(1): 73-89.

Wai, C.C. & Seng, E.L.K. 2014. Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning tools in a school of business. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences 123: 470-476.

Zhou, C. & Wang, M. 2009. The evaluation research on higher education efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science. IEEE. pp. 1-7.

Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F. & Mattos, E. 2013. Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian universities. Economic Modelling 31: 94-103.

 

*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: gidey.michael7@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

sebelumnya