The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 12 No 1 (2008): 39 – 45
HARNESSING ELECTRO DRIVEN
SEPARATION TECHNIQUE FOR THE SEPARATION OF SELECTED
AGROCHEMICALS
Wan
Aini Wan Ibrahim1, S. M. Monjurul Alam2 and Azli Sulaiman1
1Separation Science Research Group (SSRG)Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science,
University Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor
2Chemistry Department, Rajshahi University, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh
Abstract
Electro driven separation techniques offer a different approach to the analysis of complex mixtures
than do traditional pressure-driven chromatographic system; it may rely on electrophoresis, the transport of charged species through a medium by an applied field or may rely on electro
driven mobile phase to provide
a true chromatographic separation. In the current work the potential of an electro driven separation technique viz. micellar
electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC),
is
harnessed for the separation of selected agrochemicals (organophosphorus pesticides, OPPs) widely used in the agriculture
sector in Malaysia.
The current study compares the use of MEKC in normal mode (NM) and reverse mode (RM) for the separation of the selected OPPS. This
study also highlights the difference in separations produced
by performing
separations in normal mode-MEKC (NM-MEKC)
and
reverse
mode-MEKC (RM-MEKC) for the selected OPPs. In RM-MEKC,
separation is conducted at acidic pH (pH 2.5 in the current work) where the electroosmotic flow (EOF) is weak whereas
in NM-MEKC, the separation is carried out under basic pH (9.3 in this work) where the EOF is strong.
A reverse
migration order of the OPPs was observed under RM-MEKC. Separation under NM-MEKC was found to be superior
to those of RM- MEKC. A comparison is also made between separations performed under sweeping-NM-MEKC and sweeping-RM-MEKC. In sweeping, the OPPs are prepared
in the same background solution (BGS) minus the micelles and is adjusted to the same conductivity as the BGS.
The study showed that NM-MEKC is more sensitive than RM-MEKC but sweeping-RM-MEKC is
superior to sweeping-NM-MEKC. However, sweeping-RM-MEKC only separates two of the OPPs in a single run whereas sweeping-NM-MEKC separates four OPPs in a single run. The better choice of separation mode would be sweeping-NM-
MEKC for more OPPs separation in a single run.
Keywords: Micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), organophosphorus pesticides, normal mode MEKC,
reverse mode MEKC, sweeping
References
1. Terabe, S.,
Otsuka, K., Ichikawa
K., Tsuchiya, A. and Ando
T., (1984) “Electrokinetic
Separations with Micellar Solutions and
Open-Tubular Capillaries” Anal. Chem. 56. 113.
2. Terabe, S.,
Otsuka, K. and Ando
T., (1985) “Electrokinetic Chromatography with Micellar Solution and
Open-Tubular Capillary”
Anal. Chem. 57. 834.
3. Wan Ibrahim, Wan
Aini, Monjurul Alam, S. M., Sulaiman, A. B., (2005) “Comparative Study
of Two Common Surfactants
in Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography for the Separation
of Organophosphorus Pesticides”,
ACGC Chemical Research Communications. 18. 43.
4. Wan Ibrahim, Wan
Aini, Monjurul Alam, S. M., Sulaiman, A. B.,
(2005), “Organic
modifier
and Effect of Sample Matrix
in the Separation
of Organophosphorus Pesticides”,
Mal. J. Chem. 7(1). 26.
5. Zakaria, P., Macka, M. and
Haddad, P. (2003)
“Mixed-mode electrokinetic chromatography of aromatic bases with two pseudo-stationary phases and pH
control” J.
Chromatogr. A, 997. 207.
6. Farran, A., Ruiz, A., Serra, C., Aguilar,
M., (1996) “Comparative study of high-performance liquid chromatography and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography applied to the analysis of different
mixtures of pesticides” J.
Chromatogr. A. 737, 109.
7. Penmetsa, K. V., Leidy, R. B, Shea, D., (1996) “Herbicide Analysis by Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography” J. Chromatogr. A.
745.
201.
8. Hinsmann,
P.,
Arce,
A.,
Rios,
A., Valcarcel, M. (2000) “Determination of pesticides
in
waters by
automatic on-line solid-phase extraction–capillary electrophoresis” J. Chromatogr.
A. 866. 137.
9. Molina, M.,
Wiedmer, S. K., Jussila,
M., Silva, M., Riekkola, M.L. (2001) “Use of a partial filling technique and reverse migrating
micelles in the study of N-methylcarbamate pesticides by micellar
electrokinetic chromatography–electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry” J.
Chromatogr. A.
927.
191.
10. Quirino, J. P.,
Terabe, S. (1998) “Exceeding 5000-fold Concentration
of Dilute Analytes in Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography” Science.
282.465.
11. Quirino, J. P., Terabe, S. (1998) “On-line Concentration of Neutral Analytes for Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography. 3. Stacking
with Reverse Migrating
Micelles” Anal. Chem.
70. 149.
12. Quirino, J. P., Otsuka, K., Terabe, S. (1998) “On-line concentration of neutral analytes for micellar
electrokinetic chromatography. VI. Stacking using reverse migrating micelles and a water plug”
J. Chromatogr. B.
714. 29.
13. Quirino, J. P.,
Kim,
J.B., Terabe, S.,
(2002) ‘Sweeping: Concentration Mechanism and Applications to
High-Sensitivity Analysis in
Capillary Electrophoresis”
J. Chromatogr. A.
965.
357.
14. Montgomery, J. H. (1997) “Agrochemicals
Desk Reference”, Boca Raton:
Florida, USA, CRC Press, Lewis Publisher.
15. Verschueren, K. (1996) Handbook
of Environmental
Data on Organic Chemicals”,
USA: Von Nostrand, Reinhold.
16. Kim, J.B., Terabe, S.,
(2003) “On-line sample
preconcentration techniques in micellar electrokinetic
chromatography”. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
30. 1625.
17. van Zomeren, P. V., Hilhorst, M. J., Coenegracht, P. M. J., de Jong, G. J. (2000) “Resolution optimisation
in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using
empirical models” J. Chromatogr.
A. 867. 247.
18. Beckers,
J. L and Bocek, P. (2000) “Sample Stacking in Capillary
Zone Electrophoresis:
Principles, Advantages and Limitation” Electrophoresis.
21. 2747.
19. Wan Ibrahim, Wan
Aini, Monjurul Alam,
S.
M., Sulaiman,
A.
B.,
(2004)
“Stacking as an Online
Concentration of Neutral Organophosphorus Pesticides using Micellar
Electrokinetic Chromatography” Buletin Kimia,
20. 23.