The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 12 No 3 (2008): 586 - 592
ELECTROCHEMICAL PREANODIZATION OF GLASSY CARBON ELECTRODE AND APPLICATION TO DETERMINE CHLORAMPHENICOL
Nguyen Minh Truc*, John Mortensen and Nguyen Ba Hoai Anh
Department of Anal. Chem., Faculty of Chemistry, Ho Chi Minh University of Natural Sciences,
HCMC, Viet Nam.
*Corresponding author: nmtruc@hcmuns.edu.vn
Abstract
This paper suggested a method to enhance the performance of carbon electrodes for the determination of chloramphenicol (CAP). The sensitivity and the reproducibility of the carbon electrodes could be enhanced easily by electrochemical pretreatment. Some kinds of carbon material were studied including glassy carbon, graphite carbon and pyrolytic carbon. Numerous kinds of supporting electrolyte have been tried. For glassy carbon electrode, the acidic solution, H2SO4 5mM, resulted in best performance at pretreated voltage of +2.1V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in duration of 250 second. However, for graphite and pyrolytic carbon electrodes, the phosphate buffer solution pH 6.0 gave the best performance at +1.7V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in duration of 20 seconds. The detection limit could be at very low concentration of CAP: 0.8ng/ml for glassy carbon electrode, 3.5ng/ml for graphite carbon electrode. The method was successful applied to aqua-agriculture water sample and milk sample with simple extraction as well as direct ointment sample analysis.
Keywords : Chloramphenicol, electrochemical pretreatment, voltammetry, glassy carbon electrode
References
1. A. Dekanski, J. StevanovIc, R. StevanovIc, B. Ž. NikolIc, V. M. JovanovIc (2001), Glassy carbon electrodes I. Characterization and electrochemical activation, Carbon 39, 1195-1205.
2. A. L. Beilby, H. Y. Stem (1995), Electrochemical Pretreatment of Carbon Electrodes as a Function of Potential, pH, and Time, Anal. Chem. 67, 976-980.
3. D. Jurgen, E. Steckhan (1992), Influence of the supporting electrolyte and the pH on the electrooxidative activation of glassy carbon electrodes, J. Electroanal. Chem., 333, 177-193.
4. D. T. Fagan, I. Hu, and T. Kuwana (1985), Vacuum Heat Treatment for Activation of Glassy Carbon Electrodes, Anal. Chem. 57, 2759-2763.
5. E. Hershenhart, R. L. McCreery, R. D. Knight (1984), In situ cleaning and activation of solid electrode surfaces by pulsed laser light, Anal. Chem. 56, 2256-2257.
6. European Commission Decision 200216571EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (2002/657/EC) L221/8 (2002).
7. G. Ilangovan, K. Chandrasekara Pillai (1999), Machenism of activation of glassy carbon electrodes by cathodic pretreatment, J Solid State Electrochem. 3, 357-360.
8. Hao-Yu Shen, Hai-Liang Jiang (2005), Screening, determination and confirmation of chloramphenicol in seafood, meat and honey using ELISA, HPLC—UVD, GC—ECD, GC—MS—EI—SIM and GCMS—NCI—SIM methods, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 33-41.
9. J.J. V. Der Lee, W. P. Van Bennekom, H. J. De Jong (1980), Determination of chloramphenicol at ultra-trace levels by high-performance differential polarography. Application to milk and meat, Anal. Chim. Acta, 117, 171-182.
10. K. J. Stutts, P. M. Kovach, W.G. Kuhr, R. M. Wightman (1983), Enhanced electrochemical reversibility at heat-treated glassy carbon electrodes, Anal. Chem. 55; 1632-1634.
11. L. AguI, A.Guzmán, P.Yáflez-Sedeflo, J.M.Pingarrón (2002), Voltammetric determination of chloramphenicol in milk at electrochemically activated carbon fibre microelectrodes, Anal. Chim. Acta 461 65-73.
12. L. J. Kepley, A. J. Bard (1988), Ellipsometric, Electrochemical, and Elemental Characterization of the Surface Phase Produced on Glassy Carbon Electrodes by Electrochemical Activation, Anal. Chem. 60, 1459-1467.
13. M. Feng, D. Long, Y. Fang (1998), Parallel incident spectroelectrochemistry study of chloramphenicol, Anal. Chim. Acta. 363: 67-73
14. Maciej J. Bogusz, Huda Hassan, Eid Al-Enazi, Zuhour Ibrahim, Mohammed Al-Tufail (2004), Rapid determination of chloramphenicol and its glucuronide in food products by liquid chromatography— electrospray negative ionization tandem mass spectrometry, J. Chromatography B, 807 343—356.
15. Nguyen Minh Truc, John Mortensen, Nguyen Ba Hoai Anh (2005), Proceedings of The second national conference on Analytical Sciences, Hanoi, Viet Nam, 222-225.
16. R. C. Engstrom (1982), Electrochemical Pretreatment of Glassy Carbon Electrodes, Anal. Chem. 54, 2310-2314.
17. R. C. Engstrom, V. A. Strasser (1984), Characterization of Electrochemically Pretreated Glassy Carbon Electrodes , Anal. Chem. 56, 136-141.
18. R. J. Taylor, A. A. Humffray (1973), Electrochemical studies on glassy carbon electrodes: I. Electron transfer kinetics J. Electroanal. Chem. 42, 347.
19. Sandra Impens, Wim Reybroeck, Jan Vercammenc, Dirk Courtheyn, Sigrid Oogheb, Katia De Wasch, Walter Smedts, Hubert De Brabander, (2003) Screening and confirmation of chloramphenicol in shrimp tissue using ELISA in combination with GC—MS and LC—MS, Anal. Chim. Acta 483 153—163.
20. Santos, Lucia; Barbosa, Jorge; Castilho, M. Conceicao; Ramos, Fernando; Ribeiro, Carlos A. Fontes; Noronha da Silveira, M. Irene (2005). Determination of chloramphenicol residues in rainbow trouts by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta, 529, 249-256.
21. T. Nagaoka, T. Yoshino (1986), Surface Properties of Electrochemically Pretreated Glassy Carbon, Anal.Chem. 58, 1037-1042.