PDF<\/a>
DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26475\/jcil.2025.10.1.01
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_tabs admin_label=”Abstract & References” _builder_version=”4.24.3″ _module_preset=”default” body_text_align=”justify” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_tab title=”Abstrak” _builder_version=”4.24.3″ _module_preset=”default” body_text_align=”justify” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Pelanggaran perintah nafkah menjadi perkara yang saban tahun berlaku. Berdasarkan data dari Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia, pada tahun 2013 hingga 2017 sebanyak 12,983 kes tuntutan nafkah telah didaftarkan di Mahkamah Syariah seluruh Malaysia. Selangor mencatatkan jumlah pendaftaran tertinggi dengan 3,409 kes dan meningkat sebanyak 3,949 kes pada tahun 2018-2023. Antara faktor berlakunya pelanggaran nafkah ialah kecuaian plaintif dan kurangnya kegerunan terhadap perintah mahkamah. Perintah komital merupakan salah satu alternatif yang boleh dilaksanakan dalam kaedah penguatkuasaan dan pelaksanaan perintah nafkah. Perintah komital di Negeri Selangor khususnya diperuntukkan pada seksyen 151, 181 dan 229 Enakmen Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah Selangor 2003 (ETMSS 2003). Objektif kajian ini adalah mengenalpasti potensi perintah komital kerana ingkar perintah nafkah serta cabaran dalam menguatkuasakan perintah komital di Selangor. Kajian ini adalah berbentuk kajian kualitatif dengan menggunapakai kaedah analisis dokumen dan temubual separa berstruktur. Kajian dianalisa melalui kaedah deskriptif dan induktif. Dapatan kajian mendapati bahawa perintah komital boleh menjadi satu mekanisma dan berpotensi dalam mengembalikan hak nafkah yang tertunggak. Selain itu, terdapat cabaran-cabaran dalam menguatkuasakan perintah komital seperti sikap pihak-pihak, kelemahan penguatkuasaan perintah, bayaran fi yang mahal dan tempoh perbicaraan. Kajian ini turut mencadangan beberapa langkah bagi menambah baik perintah penguatkuasaan nafkah seperti penyelarasan fi dan kos, penggabungan sebutan kes dan meringkaskan tuntutan kes. Implikasi kajian artikel ini memberi informasi terkini kepada pemohon mengenai alternatif perintah komital selain memberi implikasi kepada penggubal undang-undang untuk merencana strategi berkesan bagi mengatasi cabaran-cabaran penguatkuasaan perintah nafkah.<\/p>\n
KATA KUNCI
Perintah Komital, Pemenjaraan, Perintah nafkah<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_tab][et_pb_tab title=”Abstract” _builder_version=”4.24.3″ _module_preset=”default” body_text_align=”justify” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
The violation of court-ordered maintenance remains a recurring issue each year. According to data from the Department of Syariah Judiciary Malaysia (JKSM), a total of 12,983 maintenance claims were registered in Syariah Courts throughout Malaysia from 2013 to 2017. Selangor recorded the highest number of registrations, with 3,409 cases, which increased to 3,949 cases between 2018 and 2023. Factors contributing to the non-compliance with maintenance orders include the negligence of the plaintiff and the lack of deterrence associated with court orders. The committal order is one of the enforcement mechanisms available for ensuring compliance with maintenance orders. In the state of Selangor, committal orders are specifically provided for under Sections 151, 181, and 229 of the Syariah Court Civil Procedure Enactment (Selangor) 2003 (ETMSS 2003). This study aims to examine the potential of committal orders in addressing non-compliance with maintenance orders and to identify the challenges in enforcing such orders in Selangor. Employing a qualitative research design, the study utilises document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive and inductive methods. The findings indicate that committal orders have the potential to function as an effective enforcement mechanism for recovering outstanding maintenance. However, several challenges hinder their implementation, including the attitudes of the parties involved, weak enforcement mechanisms, high fees, and prolonged trial periods. The study proposes several recommendations to improve the enforcement of maintenance orders, such as fee and cost harmonisation, case consolidation, and streamlining the claims process. The implications of this study offer updated information to applicants regarding the use of committal orders as an enforcement alternative and provide valuable insights for policymakers in formulating effective strategies to overcome the challenges of enforcing maintenance orders.<\/p>\n
KEYWORDS
Committal Order, Imprisonment, Maintenance Order<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_tab][et_pb_tab title=”References” _builder_version=”4.24.3″ _module_preset=”default” body_text_align=”justify” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
\u0368Abdul Q\u0101dir \u0368Awdah. 2008. Al-Tashr\u012b \u0368 Al-Jin\u0101\u012b Al-Isl\u0101m\u012b Muq\u0101rinan Bi Al-Q\u0101n\u016bn Al-Wa\u1e0d \u0368\u012b. Muassasah Al-Ris\u0101lah<\/p>\n
al-K\u0101s\u0101n\u012b. 1986. Bad\u0101i \u0368 Al-\u1e62an\u0101i \u0368\u2019 F\u012b Tart\u012bb Al-Shar\u0101i \u0368. D\u0101r al-Kutub al-\u0368Ilmiyyah. Jilid ke-4. D\u0101r al-Kutub al-\u2019Ilmiyah<\/p>\n
Arahan Amalan No. 3 Tahun 2012. Dicapai daripada http:\/\/syariah.terengganu.gov.my\/files\/AA201203.pdf\/<\/p>\n
Asari, K.N, Makhtar, M., N.A., Abdullah Asuhaimi, F. & Pauzai, N. A. (2017) Iddah maintenance: concept, issues and methods of enforcement. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 25 (S): 2017<\/p>\n
Azizah Bt Yaacob lwn Mustakim Bin Hassan, 10100-034-0343- 2014.<\/p>\n
Bahiyah Ahmad, Raihanah Hj. Azahari, Asmak Ab Rahman, & Mazni Abdul Wahab. (2020). Assessing the rate of child maintenance (financial support) from a shariah perspective the case of Malaysia. Al-J\u0101mi\u2018ah: Journal of Islamic Studies. Vol. 58, no. 2 (2020), pp.293-322,<\/p>\n
Enakmen Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah Negeri Selangor 2003<\/p>\n
Haliza Zurah Binti Zulkefeli lwn Mohd Rodzan Hisham Bin Mohd Jamal, 10002-075-0189-2019<\/p>\n
Ibn Qayyim. 2002. Al-Turk Al-\u1e24ukmiyyah F\u012b Al-Siy\u0101sah Al-Shar\u0368iyyah. Kaherah: D\u0101r al-\u1e24adith.<\/p>\n
Ismail, M.H., & Sulong, J. (2020). Enforcement childmaintenance payment using judgement debtor summons and judicial notice: a Penang case study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(7), 187-200<\/p>\n
Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Negeri Pulau Pinang. (2024). Penjara khas pesalah syariah perlu diwujud. Dicapai daripada https:\/\/jksnpp.penang.gov.my\/index.php\/en\/mediamenu\/ courtpublication? view=article&id=81:penjara-khaspesalah-syariah-perlu-diwujud&catid=18:penerbitanmahkamah<\/p>\n
Jazilah Mohd Saad@Mat Saud, Afridah Abbas, Noraini Hashim, & Saodah Wok. (2013). Mechanism of enforcement and execution of muslim maintenance order: court – based system. (2013) 21 IIUMLJ. 205<\/p>\n
Mahamad Naser Disa. (2011), Perintah pemulihan sebagai hukuman alternatif dalam undang-undang jenayah syariah di Malaysia. Kertas Seminar Pendakwaan Syariah, Bhg. Pendakwaan JAIS. Mahmod, Z., Buang, A. H, & Baharuddin, A. (2021).<\/p>\n
Penguatkuasaan dan Pelaksanaan Penghakiman Mahkamah Syariah: Kajian di Bahagian Sokongan Keluarga Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia (Seksyen Sarawak) Terhadap Hak Wanita dan Kanak- Kanak. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 6(39), 41-50<\/p>\n
Mawardi Che Man. 2012. Prosiding pengkomitan (seksyen 151) (Negeri Selangor) 2003. (November):<\/p>\n
Mohd Nadzri Abdul Rahman. (2013). Undang-undang tatacara mal Mahkamah Syariah prinsip dan amalan. Anugerah Cekal Sdn Bhd.<\/p>\n
Mohd Zaidi Md Zain @ Zakaria, & abdullah Hj. Abdullah. (2018). Tuntutan fasakh: kajian dari perspektif undang-undang tatacara mal. Journal of Shariah Law Research (2018) vol. 3 (1).16<\/p>\n
Mohd Zin, Najibah., Md Hashim, Noraini., Abdul Hak, Nora., Che Soh @ Yusoff, Roslina., Kamaruddin, Ibrahim., Mohd Helmi, Md Said. (2015). A baseline study of the enforcement of nafkah orders in the Selangor Syariah Court. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 23 (S). pp. 327-336.<\/p>\n
Norzaini binti Alias lwn. Mohd Sharif bin Mohd Taib, [2001]16 bhg II, 101-116<\/p>\n
Norman Zakiyy, Nur Suhaida Che Musa, Zahari Mahad Musa, Zulfakar Mamat dan Noor Fajri Ismail. (2021). Khidmat Bantuan Guaman Bagi Individu Yang Kehilangan Pekerjaan Akibat Daripada Wabak Covid-19. E-Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Islam dan Sains 2021 \u201cWawasan Kemakmuran Bersama 9 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW 2030\u201d Khamis, 9 September 2021 Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia<\/p>\n
Nur Amalina Azman, & Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin. (2017). Perintah tahanan pendapatan tenaga: satu tinjauan literatur. Journal of Shariah Law Research (2017) vol. 2 (1) 121-134 Pajar Hatma Indra Jaya. 2012. Efiktifitas penjara dalam menyelesaikan masalah sosial. HISBAH: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Dakwah Islam.<\/p>\n
Siti Jamiaah Abdul Jalil. 2017. Pengaruh program keagamaan dan sokongan sosial terhadap konsep kendiri, kebimbangan dan kemurungan: kajian dalam kalangan banduan wanita di Malaysia. Universiti Malaya.<\/p>\n
Zaini Nasohah. (2009). Cabaran Penguatkuasaan Dan Pelaksanaan Perintah Nafkah Di Mahkamah Syariah Negeri Selangor Dari Perspektif Peguam Syar’ie. Jurnal Undang-undang, 13. ISSN 1394-7729 hlm 118<\/p>\n
Zaini Nasohah & Suwaid Tapah. (2001). Analisis pelaksanaan prosiding saman penghutang penghakiman dalam penguatkuasaan perintah pembayaran nafkah: kajian kes mahkamah syariah negeri Selangor. Jurnal Undang-undang & Masyarakat 15 43-52<\/p>\n
Zaleha Kamaruddin, Mohd. Sahari Nordin dan Azizah Mohd. Kajian Perlaksanaan dan Penguatkuasaan Perintah Nafkah di Mahkamah Syariah Seluruh Malaysia 2001\u2013 2005. Cawangan Penyelidikan Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia (JKSM), Putra Jaya. 2<\/p>\n
Zanariah Noor, (2014), Penafian akses: rujukan kepada keskes yang diputuskan di mahkamah syariah di Malaysia. Jurnal Syariah, Jil. 22, Bil. 2 (2014) 129-160<\/p>\n
Zanariah Noor. (2010). Aplikasi prinsip kebajikan kanak-kanak dalam kes hadhanah. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law. 91<\/p>\n
Zarela Aizul Binti Zulkifli lwn Mohd Radzi Bin Mohd Zaidy, 1002- 023-0422-2018.<\/p>\n
Zulzaidi Mahmod & Ahmad Hidayat Buang, 2016, Kehakiman dan Penghakiman Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia: Satu Sorotan. Journal of Shariah Law Research (2016) vol. 1 (2). hlm. 201-212.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_tab][\/et_pb_tabs][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
JUNE 2025Potensi Dan Cabaran Perintah Komital Kerana Ingkar Perintah Nafkah di Mahkamah Syariah Selangor\u200b The Potential and Challenges of Committal Orders for Contempt of Maintenance Orders in the Syariah Courts of Selangor Mohamad Omar Mansu, mohamad_omar@msu.edu.myManagement and Science UniversityZaini NasohahResearch\u00a0Centre\u00a0for\u00a0Sharia,\u00a0Faculty\u00a0of\u00a0Islamic\u00a0Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaReceived: June 10, 2025 | Revised: June 11, 2025 | Accepted: June 17, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4344","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4344"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4373,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4344\/revisions\/4373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}