\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/em> \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/em> \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_tabs use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”][et_pb_tab title=”ABSTRAK” tab_font=”||||” tab_line_height=”2em” tab_line_height_tablet=”2em” tab_line_height_phone=”2em” body_font=”||||” body_line_height=”2em” body_line_height_tablet=”2em” body_line_height_phone=”2em” disabled=”off”]<\/p>\n
Permohonan kes pengesahan hibah di Mahkamah Syariah meliputi isu ijab dan qabul. Di Mahkamah Syariah, kebiasaannya Hakim-hakim Syarie membuat keputusan bagi kes-kes pengesahan hibah dengan berpandukan kepada kitab-kitab fiqh tertentu, biarpun terdapat pelbagai pendapat dalam kalangan fuqaha mengenai hibah termasuk berkaitan dengan isu ijab dan qabul. Keharusan akad hibah tanpa salah satu daripada rukun-rukun hibah menjadi persoalan yang perlu dirungkai. Dalam pada itu, timbul juga persoalan mengenai pemberian bapa kepada anak yang masih kecil, adakah bapa perlu melakukan qabul sekiranya bapa juga merupakan wali kepada penerima hibah. Justeru, artikel ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengetahui keputusan yang dibuat oleh Hakim-hakim Syarie di samping mengetahui kecenderungan penghakiman Hakim-hakim Syarie dalam mengguna pakai pandangan fuqaha bagi menyelesaikan kes-kes pengesahan hibah mengenai isu ijab dan qabul di Mahkamah Syariah. Data-data kajian ini diperoleh daripada laporan-laporan kes di Mahkamah Syariah, perbandingan mazhab dan temubual Hakim-hakim Syarie. Hasil kajian mendapati terdapat perbezaan pandangan di kalangan Hakim-hakim Syarie dalam memutuskan kes-kes pengesahan hibah walaupun dalam isu yang sama. Oleh yang demikian, dengan mengetahui kecenderungan keputusan Hakim Syarie dalam memutuskan isu ijab dan qabul, ia\u00a0 dapat membantu masyarakat dan syarikat-syarikat yang menawarkan produk hibah untuk memastikan hibah yang dibuat boleh diterima di Mahkamah Syariah.<\/p>\n
Kata kunci:<\/strong> akad, ijab, qabul, Mahkamah Syariah, qab<\/em>d<\/em><\/p>\n[\/et_pb_tab][et_pb_tab title=”ABSTRACT” tab_font=”||||” tab_line_height=”2em” tab_line_height_tablet=”2em” tab_line_height_phone=”2em” body_font=”||||” body_line_height=”2em” body_line_height_tablet=”2em” body_line_height_phone=”2em” disabled=”off”]<\/p>\n
Application of hibah endorsement in the Sharia Court includes the issue of offer and acceptance. At the Sharia Court, the judges usually decided the hibah endorsement cases based on the selected Islamic law books, even though there are various opinions\u00a0 among the Islamic jurists concerning the hibah, including the issue of offer and acceptance. The issue of permissibility of the contract of hibah without fulfilling one of it\u2019s pillars, needs clarification. Furthemore, there are issues whether the hibah made by a father to his children need also be accomplished by an acceptance of the father whom is also a guardian ad litem<\/em> to the children. Thus, this article aims to analyses on the preference of judgements made by the Sharia Court\u2019s judges while adjudicating the issue of the offer and acceptance of the contract of hibah at the Sharia Court. The data was collected from relevant reported cases in the Sharia Court, opinion of Islamic school of laws and interviews conducted with the Sharia Court\u2019s judges. The research discovers that the Sharia Court\u2019s judges differ in adjudicating the hibah endorsement cases even though the facts of the cases are similar. Thus, knowing the judges\u2019 preferences in giving judgement in the cases involving offer and acceptance, will assist society and companies that offer hibah products to ensure that their hibah contracts are recognised by the Sharia Court.<\/p>\nKeywords:<\/strong> contract, offer, acceptance, Sharia Court, qab<\/em>d<\/em><\/p>\n[\/et_pb_tab][\/et_pb_tabs][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n
RUJUKAN:<\/strong><\/p>\nAbdul Rahman bin Md Yunos. 2016. Isu-isu Hibah di Mahkamah Syariah<\/em>. Pahang: Kuantan. Temubual. 20 Januari.<\/p>\nal-c<\/sup>Asqalani, Ahmad bin c<\/sup>Ali Bin Hajr. t.th. Fat<\/em>h<\/em> al-B<\/em>a<\/em>r<\/em>i<\/em> Shar<\/em>h S<\/em>ah<\/em>i<\/em>h al-Bukh<\/em>a<\/em>r<\/em>i<\/em>. Juz. 10. t.tp.: Maktabah al-Salfiyah.<\/p>\nal-Bakri, Abu Bakar c<\/sup>Uthman Bin Muhammad Shatta al-Dimyati. 1995. Ic<\/sup><\/em>a<\/em>nah al-<\/em>Ta<\/em>lib<\/em>i<\/em>n. <\/em>Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-c<\/sup>Ilmiyyah.<\/p>\nIbn Rushd, Abi al-Walid Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Rushd al-Andalusi. 2012. Sharh Bid<\/em>a<\/em>yah al-Mujtahid wa Nih<\/em>a<\/em>yah al-Muqta<\/em>s<\/em>id<\/em>. Cet. 5. Jil. 4. Kaherah: Dar al-Salam.<\/p>\nIbn Qudamah, Abdullah bin Ahmad. t.th. al-Mughn<\/em>i<\/em>. Juz.5. Beirut: c<\/sup>Alam al-Kutub.<\/p>\nal-Jaziri, Abd Rahman. 2003. al-Fiqh c<\/sup>ala al-Madhahib al-Arbac<\/sup>ah<\/em>. Cet. 2. Jil. 3. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-c<\/sup>Ilmiyyah.<\/p>\nJurnal Hukum. 2008. Putrajaya: Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia. 26(1):73.<\/p>\n
Jurnal Hukum. 2009. Putrajaya: Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia. 27(2):225.<\/p>\n
Jurnal Hukum. 2012. Putrajaya: Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia. 35(2):307.<\/p>\n
al-Khatib, Shamsuddin Muhammad bin Muhammad. 2003. al-Iqn<\/em>a<\/em>c<\/sup><\/em> f<\/em>i<\/em> H<\/em>al Alf<\/em>az<\/em> li Ibn Shuj<\/em>a<\/em>c<\/sup><\/em>. Juz. 2. Mesir: al-Maktabah al-Tawfiqiyah.<\/p>\nMawardi bin Che Man. 2015. Isu-isu Hibah di Mahkamah Syariah<\/em>. Selangor: Shah Alam. Temubual. 24 Disember.<\/p>\nNasrul Hisyam Nor Muhamad. 2011. Hibah dalam Undang-undang Islam: Prinsip dan Amalan<\/em>. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.<\/p>\nNoor Aziah Mohd Awal. 2003. Pengenalan Kepada Sistem Perundangan di Malaysia. Selangor: International Law Book Services.<\/p>\n
al-Shafic<\/sup>i, Abi Qasim Abd Karim bin Muhammad bin Abd Karim al-Rafic<\/sup>i al-Qazwini. 1997. Al-c<\/sup>Az<\/em>i<\/em>z bi Syarh al-Waj<\/em>i<\/em>z al-Mac<\/sup>r<\/em>u<\/em>f bi Sharh al-Kab<\/em>i<\/em>r. <\/em>Cet.1. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-c<\/sup>Ilmiyah.<\/p>\nal-Shirazi, Ibn Ishak. 1996. al-Muhadhdhab f<\/em>i<\/em> al-Fiqh al-Sh<\/em>a<\/em>fic<\/sup><\/em>i<\/em>. Damshiq: Dar al-Qalam.<\/p>\nal-Zuhayli, Muhammad. <\/em>1432H\/2011. al-Muc<\/sup>tamad f<\/em>i<\/em> Fiqh Im<\/em>a<\/em>m al-Sh<\/em>a<\/em>fic<\/sup><\/em>i<\/em>. Cet. 3. Jil. 3. Damshiq: Dar al-Qalam.<\/p>\nal-Zuhayli, Wahbah. 1409H\/1989. al-Fiqh al-Islam<\/em>i<\/em> wa Adillatuh.<\/em> Cet.3. Jil. 5. hlm. 7. Damshiq: Dar al-Fikr.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.0.61″]<\/p>\n
39-51
\nPDF<\/a><\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
1 JUNE 2016 Keputusan Hakim Syarie dalam Kes-Kes Pengesahan Hibah Mengenai Sighah Sharia Judges Decission in Hibah Endorsement Cases on Sighah Nurul Syuhadah Binti Azalan, Postgraduate Student, Department of Sharia Law, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Noor Lizza Binti Mohamed Said, lizza@ukm.edu.my Department of Sharia Law, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-565","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=565"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1308,"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565\/revisions\/1308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ukm.my\/jcil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}