Background
·
a paradigm shift in curriculum
·
focusing on the needs of the students
·
putting students first, acknowledges student
voice
·
requires students to be active,
·
responsible participants in their own learning is
in contrast to teacher-centred learning
·
students actively construct their own learning
·
the use of valuable learning skills,
·
students are capable of achieving life-long
learning goals, which can further enhance student motivation in the classroom
benefits
·
Strengthens student motivation
·
Promotes peer communication
·
Reduces disruptive behaviour
·
Builds student-teacher relationships
·
Promotes discovery/active learning
·
Responsibility for one’s own learning
In teacher-directed instruction:
·
Students work to achieve curricular objectives
in order to become critical thinkers
·
Students complete activities designed by the
teacher to achieve academic success
·
Students respond to positive expectations set by
the teacher as they progress through activities
·
Students are given extrinsic motivators like
grades and rewards in which motivates children to internalize information and
objectively demonstrates their understanding of concepts
·
Student work is evaluated by the teacher
“Student learning processes are greatly enhanced when they participate in
deciding how they may demonstrate their competence in a body of knowledge or
the performance of skills.”
Bloom's Taxonomy
Assessment of student-centred learning-the most critical differences
A certain university sought to promote student-centred learning across the
entire university by employing the following methods:
·
Analysis of good practice by award-winning
teachers, in all faculties, to show that, they made use of active forms of
student learning.
·
Subsequent use the analysis to promote wider use
of good practice.
·
A compulsory teacher training course for new
junior teachers, which encouraged student-centred learning.
·
Projects funded through teaching development
grants, of which 16 were concerned with the introduction of active learning
experiences.
·
A programme-level quality enhancement initiative
which utilised a student survey to identify strengths and potential areas for improvement.
·
Development of a model of a broadly based
teaching and learning environment influencing the development of generic
capabilities, to provide evidence of the need for an interactive learning
environment.
The introduction of programme reviews as a quality assurance
measure