Sains Malaysiana 49(2)(2020): 293-303

http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2020-4902-07

 

Mineral Contents of Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) Grown at Different Locations of Turkey

(Kandungan Mineral Tanaman Kultivar Kacang Kuda (Cicer arietinum L.) di Lokasi Berbeza di Turki)

 

ÖZGE DOGANAY ERBAS KOSE* & ZEKI MUT

 

Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture and Nature Sciences, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, 11230 Bilecik, Turkey

 

Diserahkan: 20 Ogos 2019/Diterima: 25 Oktober 2019

 

ABSTRACT

Mineral deficiency-induced diseases and health problems influence billions of people worldwide. Development of edible legumes with high mineral contents will provide significant contributions in reducing the frequency of such diseases. Among the edible legumes, chickpea has quite high nutritional values and quite low production costs, thus commonly grown and consumed worldwide. This study was conducted to determine mineral (potassium, phosphorus, sulphur, calcium, magnesium, sodium, zinc, iron, boron, manganese, copper) contents of eight different chickpea cultivars (Akçin-91, Azkan, Hisar, Akça, Gökçe, Yaşa-05, Işık-05 and Çakır) grown in two different locations (Afyonkarahisar and Yozgat provinces of Turkey) for two years (2015 and 2016). Experiments were conducted in randomized blocks design with three replications. Among the minerals, potassium was highest (6435.2-8231.7 mg kg-) followed by phosphorus (2573.9-3094.0 mg kg-1) and sulphur (1710.9-2060.7 mg kg-1). Among the minerals, copper was lowest followed by boron and manganese. Considering the average of locations, it was observed that Gökçe, Akçin-91, Azkan and Hisar cultivars were prominent with sulphur content; Akça with boron, sodium and calcium contents; Yaşa-05 and Işık-05 with potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, zinc, iron, magnesium, manganese and copper contents. Çakır cultivar was stable for all minerals. The concentrations of seed P, S, Ca, Mg, B and Mn were significantly affected by locations.

 

Keywords: Cultivar; mineral; potassium; quality

 

 ABSTRAK

Penyakit disebabkan kurang mineral dan masalah kesihatan mempengaruhi berbilion orang di seluruh dunia. Pembangunan kekacang yang boleh dimakan dengan kandungan mineral yang tinggi akan memberi sumbangan yang besar dalam mengurangkan kekerapan penyakit tersebut. Antara kekacang yang boleh dimakan, kacang kuda mempunyai nilai nutrisi yang agak tinggi dengan kos pengeluaran yang agak rendah dan umumnya ditanam dan dimakan di seluruh dunia. Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengenal pasti kandungan mineral (kalium, fosforus, sulfat, kalsium, magnesium, natrium, zink, besi, boron, mangan, kuprum) lapan jenis kacang kuda berbeza kultivar (Akçin-91, Azkan, Hisar, Akça, Gökçe, Yaşa-05, Işık-05 dan Çakır) ditanam di dua lokasi berbeza (Wilayah Afyonkarahisar dan Yozgat, Turki) selama dua tahun (2015 dan 2016). Uji kaji telah dijalankan dalam reka bentuk blok rawak dengan tiga replikasi. Antara mineral, kalium adalah tertinggi (6435.2-8231.7 mg kg-1-) diikuti dengan fosforus (2573.9-3094.0 mg kg-1) dan sulfat (1710.9-2060.7 mg kg-1). Antara mineral, kuprum adalah paling rendah diikuti dengan boron dan mangan. Mengambil kira purata lokasi, telah diperhatikan bahawa kultivar Gökçe, Akçin-91, Azkan dan Hisar menonjol dengan kandungan sulfat; Akça dengan boron, natrium dan kandungan kalsium; Yaşa-05 dan Işık-05 dengan kalium, fosforus, magnesium, zink, besi, mangan dan kandungan kuprum. Kultivar Çakır adalah stabil untuk semua mineral. Kepekatan benih P, S, Ca, Mg, B dan Mn dengan ketara terjejas disebabkan lokasi.

 

Kata kunci: Kalium; kualiti; kultivar; mineral

 

RUJUKAN

Akdag, C. 2001. Determination of sowing time with chickpea varieties that will provide high yield in Tokat. JAFAG 59: 19.

Alajaji, S.A. & El-Adawy, T. 2006. Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by microwave cooking and other traditional cooking methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19: 806-812.

Arab, E.A.A., Helmy, I.M.F. & Bareh, G.F. 2010. Nutritional evaluation and functional properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) flour and the improvement of spaghetti produced from its. Journal of American Science 6(10): 1055-1072.

Bayrak, H. & Onder, M. 2017. Determination of agricultural, technological and nutritional characteristics of local populations and varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivated in Konya ecological region. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 26: 52-61.

Budag, C. 2009. Feed grain legumes and usage in ruminant nutrition. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences 14(2): 88-101.

Bueckert, R.A., Thavarajah, P. & Pritchard, J. 2011. Phytic acid and mineral micronutrients in field-grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars from Western Canada. Eur. Food Res. Technol233(2): 203-212.

Ceran, F. 2015. Determination of some agricultural characteristics on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars that are sown at different periods. PhD Thesis. Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey (Unpublished).

Daur, I., Khan, I.A. & Jahangir, M. 2008. Nutritional quality of roasted and pressure-cooked chickpea compared to raw (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Sarhad J. Agric. 24(1): 117.

Elinç, F. 2007. Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility. Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Agriculture. Textbook. No: 51.

Erbaş Köse, Ö.D. & Mut, Z. 2019. Determination of mineral content of chickpea varieties and lines grown in Turkey. Derim. 36(1): 73-78.

FAO. 2017. Statistical Databases. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed on 1st April 2019.

Gomez, K.A. & Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

Gulumser, A., Bozoglu, H. & Peksen, E. 2008. Edible Legumes. Ondokuz Mayıs University Agriculture Faculty. Texbook. No: 27.

Hangen, L. & Bennink, M.R. 2002. Consumption of black beans and navy beans (Phaseolus vulgarisreduced azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in rats. Nutr. Cancer 44: 60-65.

Haq, M.Z.U., Iqbal, S., Shakeel, A., İmran, M., Niaz, A. & Bhanger, M. 2007. Nutritional and compositional study of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars grown in Punjab. Pakistan Food Chemistry 105(4): 1357-1363.

Iqbal, A., Khalil, I.A., Ateeq, N. & Khan, M.S. 2006. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chemistry 97: 331-335.

Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L. & Chibbar, R.N. 2012. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. British Journal of Nutrition 108(S1): 11-26.

Kacar, B. 1984. Plant Nutrition. AÜ Faculty of Agriculture Publications. Textbook. No: 5090. p. 317.

Kacar, B. & Katkat, A.V. 1998. Plant Nutrition. Uludag University Pub No: 127. Vipas Press: 3, Bursa.

Kahraman, A., Ceyhan, E. & Harmankaya, M. 2015. Nutritional variation and drought tolerance in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)J. Elem. 20(2): 331-341.

Khetarpaul, N. 2018. Total mineral content present (calcium, magnesium, potassium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, manganese, copper, and boron and nickel) in leaves of Desi and Kabuli chickpea varieties (on dry matter basis). IJCS 6(2): 633-635.

Lee, S.C., Prosky, L. & Devries, J.W. 1992. Determination of total, soluble, and insoluble dietary fibre in foods-enzymatic-gravimetric method, mes-tris buffer: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 75: 395-416.

Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press. pp. 379-396.

Mut, Z. & Gulumser, A. 1998. The effects of bacteria inoculation, zinc and molybdenum application on some quality traits of Damla-89 chickpea cultivar. Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Agriculture Journal 20(2): 1-10.

Ozcan, M.M., Dursun, N. & Juhaimi, F.A. 2013. Macro-and microelement contents of some legume seeds. Environ. Monit. Assess185(11): 9295-9298.

Ray, H., Bett, K., Taran, B., Vandenberg, A., Thavarajah, D. & Warkentin, T. 2014. Mineral micronutrient content of cultivars of field pea, chickpea, common bean, and lentil grown in Saskatchewan, Canada. Crop Sci. 54(4): 1698-1708.

SAS, INC SAS/STAT users’ guide release 7.0. 1998. Cary, NC, USA.

TUIK. 2017. Agricultural statistics database. Ankara: Turkish Statistical Institute.www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed on 1st May 2019.

Vandemark, G.J., Grusak, M.A. & Mcgee, R.J. 2018. Mineral concentrations of chickpea and lentil cultivars and breeding lines grown in the US Pacific Northwest. The Crop Journal 6(3): 253-262.

Viswanathan, B. & Sudha, K. 1989. Photoelectrochemical properties of platinised TiO2Asian Journal of Chemistry 1(2): 129.

Wang, N. & Daun, J.K. 2004. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Canadian pulses. Canadian Grain Commission. pp. 19-29.

Wang, N., Hatcher, D.W., Tyler, R.T., Toews, R. & Gawalko, E.J. 2010. Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International 43(2): 589-594.

Wood, A. & Grusak, M.A. 2007. Nutritional value of chickpea. In Chickpea Breeding and Management, edited by Yadav, S.S., Redden, B., Chen, W. & Sharma, B. Wallingford, UKC: AB International. pp. 101-142.

Yalçın, F., Mut, Z. & Erbas Kose, O.D. 2018. Determination of suitable chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to provide high yield in Afyonkarahisar and Yozgat Conditions. JAFAG 35(1): 46-59.

 

*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: ozgedoganay.erbas@bilecik.edu.tr

 

 

 

sebelumnya