Issue logo

Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia

56 (2) 2022 1 – 16

Does Recomposed Institutions Quality Alleviate Extreme Income Inequality?
Adakah Kualiti Institusi yang Dikomposisi Semula Mengurangkan Ketaksamaan Pendapatan Melampau?

Department of Economics
Faculty of Accountancy and Management
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
Bandar Sungai Long, 43000 Kajang, Selangor
MALAYSIA.

harwm@utar.edu.my

Department of Economics
Faculty of Economics and Management
Universiti Putra Malaysia
43400 Serdang Selangor
MALAYSIA.


Department of Economics
Faculty of Economics and Management
Universiti Putra Malaysia
43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor
MALAYSIA.


Department of Economics
Faculty of Economics and Management
Universiti Putra Malaysia
43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor
MALAYSIA.


Abstract

This paper aims to study the effect of recomposed institution quality to extreme income inequality. Findings reveal aggregated institutional quality of World Governance Indicators (WGI) have anomalies, distorted by its individual components’ incongruent relationships with income inequality. The study covers period from 2010 to 2017 and applies quantile regression method due to rejection of normality of residuals and present of data clustering. Total of 43 countries are selected based on availability of data. WGIs do not always have negative relationship with income inequality. The recomposed WGI-plus and WGI-minus are all significant at correct sign, except insignificant for one case. These findings contribute six implications. Firstly, the WGI has subconsciously set democracy and free market as “good quality” institution, yet findings of positive relationship reveal this is not completely true. Secondly, the positive findings in control of corruption signal possible serious structural flaws regarding policies, perception, and its conceptualization. Thirdly, middle-income countries have relatively more anomalies. Fourthly, relatively more insignificant results of certain WGI components in middle-income countries cast doubt on their system of separation of power, prompting critical review of political will and governance effectiveness towards inclusiveness. Fifth, the significant results of the recomposed WGI enhance call for not aggregating all components of institution quality in future research and policy making decision. Sixth, the classic school that propagated free market is not effective to reduce inequality. Keynesian economies, especially targeted fiscal expenditure helps in middle-income but not high-income counties.

 

Keywords

anomalies; income inequality; Institutional quality; quantile regression; WGI

JEL Codes

D630, I320, O170
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5602-1
No. of views: 641
View Full Text

Similar Articles

  1. The Resurgence of Income Inequality in Asia-Pacific: The Role of Trade Openness, Educational Attainment and Institutional Quality
  2. Pembangunan Kewangan, ICT dan Jurang Pendapatan: Bukti Empirikal Data Panel Dinamik
  3. The Incidence and the Effect of Overskilling on Individuals’ Wages in Malaysia: A Quantile Regression Approach

Bibliography

Export Bibliography

Mun, H. W., Hook, L. S., Niaz Ahmad, M. N., & Mazlan, N. S. (2022). Does Recomposed Institutions Quality Alleviate Extreme Income Inequality?. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(2), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5602-1

@article{mun2022does,
  title={Does Recomposed Institutions Quality Alleviate Extreme Income Inequality?},
  author={Mun, Har Wai and Hook, Law Siong and Niaz Ahmad, Mohd Naseem and Mazlan, Nur Syazwani},
  journal={Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia},
  volume={56},
  number={2},
  pages={1—16},
 

year={2022},
}

Receive updates when new articles are published.